This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Was the danger in Nadapuram Muslims in particular, or more generally, 'barbarians'? A while ago, this article held that Unniyarcha was dissuaded from travelling as 'barbarians'/'dacoits'/'hooligans' were many: it was not stated particularly that the barbarians were Muslim.
Because it is fake: there is no historical basis for this depiction. It is just an image the AI invented based on its training. As yet, there are no official guidelines for AI on Wikipedia, but we have image use policies and in general don't want to mislead the reader.
Besides, the fake image doesn't make sense. If she's in her palanquin, how did these corpses turn up? Also, I think one of the bodies is about to get stepped on. Cremastra (u — c) 21:58, 4 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
The caption says after killing jonakas. she is returning after killing jonakas.
Painting have artistic angles. In some you cannot explicitly see the character as like here. This painting is where she is returning in her palanquin after killing jonakas.
the core for this incident is this:
- While she was travelling through nadapuram town in kerala in her palanquin , some jonakas tried to sexually assualt her. she killed them with all with her urumi and returned back.
The painting:
- captures exactly the same event depiction.
A human painter will draw this event as this , or more or less somewhat same as this.
Model is trained with images drawn by humans and images taken from camers, and it has immense images from kerala, so it correctly depicts the attire, coconut trees at background, and kerala style buldings with brick mud blocks as roof. even the palanquin is of Kerala style. model is well trained and it's encoder decoder attention mechanism captures very details.
An AI-generated image is still utterly different from a painting by someone who was there or (since this is a legendary character) is at least familiar with the stories. This is a human encyclopedia, not an AI encyclopedia, and made-up images have no place in it.
3O Response: I don't see a policy based argument for inclusion and the editor arguing for inclusion is also a sock. The image should be left out until there's a consensus to include. Nemov (talk) 14:08, 5 January 2025 (UTC) Nemov (talk) 14:08, 5 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
3O Response: I don't see a policy based argument for inclusion and the editor arguing for inclusion is also a sock. The image should be left out until there's a consensus to include. Nemov (talk) 14:08, 5 January 2025 (UTC) Nemov (talk) 14:08, 5 January 2025 (UTC)